<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>siteIQ, Inc &#187; siteIQ Website Best Practices Research Group</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.siteiq.net/tag/oracle-com-ca-com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.siteiq.net</link>
	<description>Website Best Practices</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:41:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Website Rankings: Hits, misses &amp; a little bit more</title>
		<link>http://www.siteiq.net/2657/website-rankings-hits-misses-a-little-bit-more</link>
		<comments>http://www.siteiq.net/2657/website-rankings-hits-misses-a-little-bit-more#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 13:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marty Gruhn</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Website Rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brocade.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deloitte.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intel.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[juniper.net]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newegg.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nortel.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oracle.com ca.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sap.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symantec.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siteiq.net/?p=2657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are plenty of hits and misses on the siteIQ eBusiness Index. Cisco.com, Symantec.com and Intel.com are hits. SAS.com and Deloitte.com are huge misses.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://www.siteiq.net/2657/website-rankings-hits-misses-a-little-bit-more' addthis:title='Website Rankings: Hits, misses &#38; a little bit more ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2><a href="http://74.220.207.194/~siteiqne/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/man-with-screens-r-gutter.jpg" rel="lightbox[2657]"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2716" style="border: 0pt none;" title="man with screens" src="http://74.220.207.194/~siteiqne/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/man-with-screens-r-gutter-203x300.jpg" alt="" width="217" height="321" /></a>There are plenty of hits and misses on this year&#8217;s roster. My favorites are . . .</h2>
<p>In my last post, I shared some info about the top five Websites on the siteIQ eBusiness Index. Here’s my interesting surprises and “oops” list:</p>
<p><strong>Symantec.com’s usability ranks second</strong>, and the site misses a “Good Practice” rating by a hair.</p>
<p>Juniper.net and Oracle.com complete the usability top five. Of the two,<strong> Juniper.net is most likely to move up a slot and knock CA.com off its perch</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Intel.com aced the online recruiting category</strong> and is the only four star (the best) in this category. (OK, so most recruiting zones are a big snooze – but we have to give Intel.com chops for its four star performance).</p>
<p><strong>Services marketing continues to be Nortel.com’s claim to fame</strong>; HP.com and IBM.com are still second tier contenders.</p>
<p>Juniper.net hits the high note in the communities category – but Cisco.com and Intel.com also operate four star (the best) communities. (This is another way of saying that <strong>the new guys are zipping past community pioneers</strong>).</p>
<p><strong>If call to action is your bag, look no further than Cisco.com</strong>. It is the only call to action “Best Practice” site on the eBusiness Index.</p>
<p><strong>Newegg.com’s e-commerce capabilities puts it with the big boys</strong>: Dell.com &amp; HP.com. Newegg ranks third with four stars (the best) and a “Good Practice” nod.</p>
<p>A couple of new entrants on the 2010 eBusiness Index roster did better than expected.</p>
<ul>
<li>Brocade.com and EMC.com rank 7<sup>th</sup> and 8<sup>th</sup> on the usability chart – and finish in the middle of the pack when all of the scores are tallied up (EMC.com ranks 12<sup>th</sup>; Brocade ranks 14<sup>th</sup>).</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Among the sites that debuted on the Index in 2010, <strong>Deloitte.com and SAS.com turned out to be boat anchors</strong>. Deloitte finished dead last – and SAS.com debuted in 17<sup>th</sup> place (out of 23 Websites).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Related research:</strong> The <a href="http://siteiq.net/siteiq-ebusiness-index/2010-ebusiness-index-rankings">eBusiness Index Report</a>.  If you are a siteIQ client or subscriber, click <a href="https://siteiq.centraldesktop.com/sirc/blogentry/9499468/">here</a>.</p>
<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://www.siteiq.net/2657/website-rankings-hits-misses-a-little-bit-more' addthis:title='Website Rankings: Hits, misses &amp; a little bit more ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.siteiq.net/2657/website-rankings-hits-misses-a-little-bit-more/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.siteiq.net/tag/oracle-com-ca-com/feed ) in 0.39955 seconds, on Feb 9th, 2012 at 7:55 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 9th, 2012 at 8:55 am UTC -->
