logo


What we can all learn from Microsoft.com’s fat footers

Fat Footers
First, I have to be honest. I’ve never been a big fan of the Microsoft.com site. From the outside in, this site has always felt like it’s operated by tribes of warring stakeholders who don’t give a fig about what the others are doing. The net result is littered all over the ...
Continue Reading →

The NewIQ | What we did. The best practices that inspired it. What it means for you.

The New siteIQ 2012
Last week we launched the “New IQ”. I think of it as the next evolution of our living lab where we put the best ideas from the best teams we learn from to work – and where we take our own medicine. Let’s just say that there’s nothing like following your own advice to make su...
Continue Reading →

Usability Winners & Losers | Big surprises—and some things to watch for this year

Website Usability. UX.
In part 3 of my usability reviews, I share which Websites delivered some big surprises – which ones fell short of expectations – and the sites I’ll be checking in on regularly this year. Top of my list? Cisco.com, IBM.com, Symantec.com’s new site, Juniper.net and Brocade.com. ...
Continue Reading →

Usability Winners | What, Why—and Who does it best

Website Usability. UX.
Part 2 in a blissfully short series (that’s a little longer than I expected) In my last post, I shared why usability is really a tale of two cities and why dotcom teams need a totally different usability view than the stakeholders who own different parts of a Website. In this post, ...
Continue Reading →

Usability: a tale of two cities (and why you should care)

Website Usability. UX.
(Part 1 in a blissfully short series) We are putting the final touches on a new report that ranks and rates leading IT Websites based on how effectively they achieve critical design & business goals (at siteIQ we call them usability “dimensions”). You know what those are. Thos...
Continue Reading →

Best Practices are About Execution

For the last week I have been scouring some sites for best practices. During my search I have come across the occasional moment of interest. But more often I have found great ideas that weren’t fully executed. Fantastic puzzle pieces that never create the whole picture. Missed oppor...
Continue Reading →

2011 Online Support Rankings | Why the biggest aren’t always the best

Online Support
Given my opinion of support on the Web I was surprised how much the 2011 support evaluations mirroed my (largely poor) opinions of the support sites under the siteIQ microscope. Most deliver half of the content features & capabilities needed; most miss the Good Practice mark So mu...
Continue Reading →

2011 siteIQ eBusiness Index | Networking Systems | Cisco stays on top. Juniper loses #2 in Usability. HP Networking mixes it all up.

2011 Networking Systems Website Report
And the Winner Is… Overall: Cisco.com Usability & Effectiveness: Cisco.com Content, Features & Capabilities: Cisco.com Site refreshes, redesigns, and company acquisitions. All were in play in the networking systems segment last year. Did these facelifts improve these sit...
Continue Reading →

Don’t Miss/Don’t Bother | The New Intel.com

Don't Miss/Don't Bother
This week, we took the new Intel.com site for a spin. Let’s just say there’s more (and less) to this site than meets the eye. Kenna Dian: Don’t Bother Intel.com’s latest redesign is like buying an exotic car. It is visually striking, can be fun to drive, and has more b...
Continue Reading →

Visions of IBM.com’s grand redesign emerge

Website Launch.
Recently Marty Gruhn and I put IBM.com’s new mega-menu under the microscope and the results were…well…less than stellar. But a couple accidental slips of my cursor exposed some other new designs and approaches that are well worth taking a spin around the IBM.com site. With some...
Continue Reading →